It's a good sign for a performance when a professional music reviewer stays for the second half. Friday night, I went with my friend Peter who used to review for the Washington papers, plus his partner, Paul, and Robert to hear the National Symphony Orchestra at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Stereotypically, Peter leaves at the intermission when we go to things, but he actually stayed for the whole show this time.
I don't know why, but it often seems to me that many music reviewers leave at intermission. Publishing deadlines? I don't know....maybe in New York, but in other cities, the reviews typically don't appear in the papers the next morning, but not until the following day. There have been many performances, though, where I've been on stage or in the audience, and when I read the review, it seemed as though the "review" was largely written from the advance press materials provided by the company and then the reviewer would make some general glowing comments about things, then always there would be one little negative observation--always from something in the first act--to "prove" that the reviewer was actually there.
Well, we actually went to the entire concert and stayed to the very end, when, as it turned out, the most interesting thing of the evening happened; more about that later.
It seems as though the NSO is going through a series of guest conductors, austensibly "auditioning" for the soon-to-be-vacant post of music director, what with the impending retirement of Leonard Slatkin at the end of this season. This weekend's guest conductor is Mark Elder, CBE,a Brit who's currently music director of The Hallé, the orchestra in Manchester, England. Elder was, I thought, a very understated conductor, and the musicians played well for him with a tight, focused, and together sound.
The programming choices for the evening were a little odd, and I was hard pressed to find a theme running though them, though the official idea was that the works all showed the juxtaposition of sadness and joy.
They opened with Stravinsky's Danses Concertantes, a work, actually, for chamber orchestra. The small ensemble was gathered around the podium and came up with a surprisingly intimate sound. I thought it interesting to note how, what with all these years of being subjected to modern music, I found the Stravinsky to sound rather old-fashioned. Phil had warned us that during Thursday's performance, he found the Stravinsky to be incredibly boring and he couldn't wait for it to get over; we didn't come away with as negative an impression of it Friday.
After a brief pause to allow the stage crew to reset the chairs for the full orchestra and to bring on the piano, we met the piano soloist for the evening, Canadian Louis Lortie. I was very pleased to see Lortie wearing the proper white tie and tails for his performance (Mo. Elder was wearing one of those hideous European black Nehru jacket things that hung on him like an untailored sack coat).
Lortie played the Prokofiev Piano Concerto No. 1 in D-flat major, Op. 10. He brought a special piano in for the performance, but I thought it had rather too bright a sound. Lortie seemed to have fun playing, rather insouciantly wagging his head from side to side as he played. I don't know, perhaps some of the cadenzas sounded a little ragged and rushed with a little too much crash and bang. Peter opined, though, that Lortie sounded to him like a "drunken lounge pianist."
He returned to the stage in the second half of the concert to play the major piano part in Francis Poulenc's little private ballet commission, Aubade, concerto chorégraphique for piano and 18 instruments. I thought Lortie's playing was much more sensitive in this piece. Once again, the stage was arranged for this small ensemble that, interestingly, included strings but no violins. I was unfamiliar with the work; it didn't really recall other Poulenc harmonies and compositional structures. Peter had heard a recording of this before, and thought the instant performance not as "sweet" as the recording.
The final work of the evening (after yet another pause to rearrange the stage) was the Shostakovich Symphony No. 6 in B minor, Op. 54. I've never really understood the concept of Russian politics in music, but this is supposedly a piece that is gloriously "Soviet." I've always found the very long first movement Largo to be rather boring and unexciting (is that an analogy for life in Soviet Russia?); things don't pick up until the second and third movements. Those movements can be very demanding for an orchestra, and I thought the NSO acquitted themselves well.
The Shostakovich gave us an opportunity for an amusing moment for the evening. Now, for those of you who have never been in the Concert Hall at the Kennedy Center, the hall's stage is designed as a platform with a sort of sound shell behind it, with no curtains, wings, or other theatrical stage trappings. In the back are also the organ pipes and seating for about 70 in what are called "choristers," the place where the choir sits during choral-orchestral performances. If no choir is on the agenda, those seats are sold to the general public at the cheapest price in the house. Well, this is spring break season, so some school group bought up about four dozen of those tickets and the kids got to listen from there. Except, about halfway through the long Largo, there was an incident.
One of the boys sitting on the end of the front row got sick and apparently lost his dinner. Now, I didn't exactly see the event in question, but I did notice the reaction from the twelve or so teenaged girls in the row next to him as they all melodramatically, in the way only teenaged girls can do, covered their noses with their hands, jackets, and blankets, and several of them scooted away, filling in empty seats on the row and even sharing seats. Meanwhile, a teacher/chaperone guided the boy out of his seat and took him outside. Eventually, a house staff member came to the end of the row to inspect the "damage" and left, apparently deciding it could wait the fifteen minutes or so til the end of the concert. The girls, though, maintained their act for the rest of the evening, though I can't imagine that things were all that bad, since the people on the row directly behind the boy's seat seemed to have little to no reaction. Needless to say, Maestro was not pleased, and during the break between movements, he seemed to be staring the girls down and glowering at them.
The poor boy. The ultimate indignity, though, was that when we left the auditorium and were out in the inner lobby, the boy and teacher/chaperone were sitting on a sofa where everyone could walk by and stare at him. I suppose he'll have memories of Washington to talk about when he gets back home!
Sunday, March 30, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment